I haven't cared much for the Lamont/Lieberman race much, because I didn't think it mattered. Lieberman would caucus with the Dems, so it doesn't matter to me. However, talk that his caucusing with us is not a sure thing is starting to get to me. Especially if there is a tie in the Senate and Joe puts his allegiance up for sale. Now look at this article from the Atlantic, in which a neocon recommends:
Recruit Joe Lieberman for 2008
Full story:
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/...
This comes after the part where he talks about the inevitability of bombing Iran.
Quote:
"Recruit Joe Lieberman for 2008. Twice in the last quarter-century we had the good fortune to see presidents elected who were sympathetic to our understanding of the world. In 2008, we will have a lot on the line. The policies that we have championed will remain unfinished. The war on terror will still have a long way to go. The Democrats have already shown that they are incurably addicted to appeasement, while the "realists" among the GOP are hoping to undo the legacy of George W. Bush. Sen. John McCain and former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani both look like the kind of leaders who could prosecute the war on terror vigorously and with the kind of innovative thought that realists hate and our country needs. As for vice presidential candidates, how about Condoleezza Rice or even Joe Lieberman? Lieberman says he's still a Democrat. But there is no place for him in that party. Like every one of us, he is a refugee. He's already endured the rigors of running for the White House. In 2008, he deserves another chance--this time with a worthier running mate than Al Gore."